The Inauthenticity Behind Black Lives Matter

Pre­mi­um con­tent from WSJ.

Sen. Tim Scott of South Car­oli­na gave a remark­able speech at this year’s Repub­li­can Nation­al Con­ven­tion. Yes, here was a black man at a GOP event, so there was a whiff of iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics. When we see col­or these days, we expect ide­ol­o­gy to fol­low. But Mr. Scott’s charis­ma that night was sim­ply that he spoke as a per­son, not a spokesper­son for his color.

Burgess Owens, Her­schel Walk­er, Daniel Cameron and sev­er­al oth­ers did the same. It was a parade of indi­vid­u­als. And in their speech­es the human being stepped out from behind the iden­ti­ty, telling per­son­al sto­ries that reached for human con­nec­tions with the Amer­i­can people—this rather than the usu­al pos­tur­ing for lever­age with tales of griev­ance. So they were all fresh and compelling.

Do these Repub­li­cans fore­tell a new racial order in Amer­i­ca? Clear­ly they have pushed their way through an old racial order, as have—it could be argued—many black Trump vot­ers in the recent elec­tion. I believe there is in fact a new racial order slow­ly and ten­u­ous­ly emerg­ing, and that we blacks are swim­ming through rough seas to reach it. But to bet­ter see the new, it is nec­es­sary to know the old.

The old began in what might be called America’s Great Con­fes­sion. In pass­ing the 1964 Civ­il Rights Act, Amer­i­ca effec­tive­ly con­fessed to a long and ter­ri­ble col­lu­sion with the evil of racism. (Pres­i­dent Kennedy was the first pres­i­dent to acknowl­edge that civ­il rights was a “moral issue.”) This trig­gered noth­ing less than a cri­sis of moral author­i­ty that threat­ened the very legit­i­ma­cy of Amer­i­can democracy.

Even today, almost 60 years beyond the Civ­il Rights Act, groups like Black Lives Mat­ter, along with a vast griev­ance indus­try, use America’s inse­cure moral author­i­ty around race as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to assert them­selves. Doesn’t BLM dwell in a space made for it by America’s racial self-doubt?

In the cul­ture, whites and Amer­i­can insti­tu­tions are effec­tive­ly man­dat­ed by this con­fes­sion to prove their inno­cence of racism as a con­di­tion of moral legit­i­ma­cy. Blacks, in turn, are man­dat­ed to hon­or their new free­dom by devel­op­ing into edu­ca­tion­al and eco­nom­ic par­i­ty with whites. If whites achieve racial inno­cence and blacks devel­op into par­i­ty with whites, then Amer­i­ca will have over­come its orig­i­nal sin. Democ­ra­cy will have become manifest.

This was America’s post-con­fes­sion bar­gain between the races—innocence on the white hand, devel­op­ment on the black. It defined the old order with which those con­ven­tion speak­ers seemed to break. But there is a prob­lem with these man­dates: To achieve their ends, they both need blacks to be vic­tims. Whites need blacks they can save to prove their inno­cence of racism. Blacks must put them­selves for­ward as vic­tims the bet­ter to make their case for entitlements.

This is a cor­rup­tion because it makes black suf­fer­ing into a moral pow­er to be wield­ed, rather than a con­di­tion to be over­come. This is the pow­er that blacks dis­cov­ered in the ’60s. It gained us a War on Pover­ty, affir­ma­tive action, school bus­ing, pub­lic hous­ing and so on. But it also seduced us into turn­ing our iden­ti­ty into a vir­tu­al cult of victimization—as if our per­se­cu­tion was our eter­nal flame, the deep­est truth of who we are, a trag­ic fate we trade on. After all, in an indif­fer­ent world, it may feel bet­ter to be the vic­tim of a great his­tor­i­cal injus­tice than a per­son left out of his­to­ry when that injus­tice recedes.

Yet there is an ele­phant in the room. It is sim­ply that we blacks aren’t much vic­tim­ized any more. Today we are free to build a life that won’t be stunt­ed by racial per­se­cu­tion. Today we are far more like­ly to encounter racial pref­er­ences than racial dis­crim­i­na­tion. More­over, we live in a soci­ety that gen­er­al­ly shows us goodwill—a soci­ety that has iso­lat­ed racism as its most unfor­giv­able sin.

This lack of vic­tim­iza­tion amounts to an “absence of mal­ice” that pro­found­ly threat­ens the vic­tim-focused black iden­ti­ty. Who are we with­out the mal­ice of racism? Can we be black with­out being vic­tims? The great dimin­ish­ment (not erad­i­ca­tion) of racism since the ’60s means that our vic­tim-focused iden­ti­ty has become an anachro­nism. Well suit­ed for the past, it strains for rel­e­vance in the present.

Thus, for many blacks today—especially the young—there is a feel­ing of inau­then­tic­i­ty, that one is only thin­ly black because one isn’t racial­ly per­se­cut­ed. “Sys­temic racism” is a term that tries to recov­er authen­tic­i­ty for a less and less con­vinc­ing black iden­ti­ty. This racism is real­ly more com­pen­sato­ry than sys­temic. It was invent­ed to make up for the increas­ing absence of the real thing.

This sum­mer, in cities from Port­land, Ore., to Bal­ti­more, black protest seemed dri­ven more by the angst of inau­then­tic­i­ty than by any real men­ace. The protests them­selves came off as the­ater. There were cos­tumes, masks and well-rehearsed mimes of con­fronta­tion and out­rage. The vio­lence was destruc­tive, but only to a point. After all it was cal­i­brat­ed to go on for months. In the sum­mer of 2020, self-con­scious­ness replaced spon­tane­ity as the essence of youth­ful protest in America—yet anoth­er sign that there is not enough real vic­tim­iza­tion to light the sort of fire that burned down Detroit in the ’60s.

I doubt that any of the black speak­ers at the RNC would argue that racism has van­ished from Amer­i­can life. What makes them har­bin­gers of a new racial order is that they unpair vic­tim­iza­tion from iden­ti­ty. Vic­tim­iza­tion may be an expe­ri­ence we endure, but it should nev­er be an iden­ti­ty that defines us. They all spoke as Amer­i­can cit­i­zens in a spir­it of citizenship.

This is the great chal­lenge that always awaits the oppressed after free­dom is achieved. If only out of loy­al­ty to our past (all this suf­fer­ing has to mean some­thing), we will feel com­pelled to make vic­tim­iza­tion the cen­ter­piece of our iden­ti­ty today. This will seem the authen­tic and hon­or­able thing to do. But it will only fur­ther invest us in pre­cise­ly the fruit­less tan­gle of iden­ti­ty and wound­ed­ness that mires us in the past. We should nev­er deny the past, but it should only inform and inspire.

In the end, only one achieve­ment will turn us from the old vic­tim-focused racial order toward a new, non­ra­cial order: the full and unqual­i­fied accep­tance of our free­dom. We don’t have to fight for free­dom so much any more. We have to do some­thing more difficult—fully accept that we are free


Big Tech is at war with you! They don't want you to see the truth. Bookmark us and visit daily. 


Send this to a friend