Sidney Powell Potentially Signaling Different Kind Of Military Involvement

Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump and Team Trump attor­ney Jen­na Ellis have both indi­cat­ed that there are no plans to use the Insur­rec­tion Act and impose Mar­tial Law to inter­vene on the con­test­ed elec­tion. How­ev­er, there are oth­er routes to take using mil­i­tary involve­ment which attor­ney Sid­ney Pow­ell could poten­tial­ly be sug­gest­ing through her telegram channel.

Pow­ell has devel­oped a very pow­er­ful tool for com­mu­ni­cat­ing in an ‘end around’ the cor­rupt cor­po­rate media. The new medi­um — the encrypt­ed app Telegram, which is very easy to use and very effective.

The lega­cy media has lost all cred­i­bil­i­ty and is dying; a Telegram chan­nel is a new path ris­ing to replace the cur­rent cen­sor­ship and Chicom pro­pa­gan­da we see in the for­mer­ly Main­stream Media.

Powell’s chan­nel is grow­ing fast with almost 5,000 sub­scribers at the writ­ing of this article.

Cre­ative Destruc­tion Media ana­lyzes the Pow­ell’s cryp­tic post:

First, Pow­ell has pinned to the top of the chan­nel a post report­ing she is being con­sid­ered by POTUS to be the spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor to inves­ti­gate elec­tion fraud.

Sec­ond, Pow­ell posts two sto­ries on mil­i­tary involve­ment in domes­tic pol­i­tics after the much-report­ed late-night meet­ing in The Oval Office on Fri­day which she attend­ed with Lt Gen Michael Flynn.

One is an excerpt from a U.S. mil­i­tary joint doc­trine pub­li­ca­tion on civ­il-mil­i­tary oper­a­tions stating,…

“Mil­i­tary gov­ern­ment is the supreme author­i­ty the mil­i­tary exer­cis­es by force or agree­ment over the lands, prop­er­ty, and IPIs of DOMESTIC [empha­sis mine], allied, or ene­my ter­ri­to­ry, When required to achieve nation­al strate­gic objec­tives or pro­tect nation­al inter­ests, the US nation­al lead­er­ship may decide to inter­vene mil­i­tar­i­ly. US forces in sup­port of the [US Gov­ern­ment] sta­bi­liza­tion effort sup­port an elec­tion process in order to con­firm the legit­i­ma­cy of the gov­ern­ment before all sov­er­eign respon­si­bil­i­ties are restored to the new gov­ern­ment and US polit­i­cal will is enforced.”

The sec­ond is a tweet by Pres­i­dent Trump say­ing reports he will impose mar­tial law on the coun­try are ‘fake news’.

The upshot is this — these posts seem to paint the pic­ture POTUS has pos­si­bly made a deci­sion to move for­ward with some type of U.S. mil­i­tary involve­ment in the elec­tion process, pos­si­bly to hold new elec­tions in dis­put­ed states. Pow­ell is infer­ring POTUS will NOT be impos­ing mar­tial law, which is tem­po­rary mil­i­tary con­trol of the nation’s domes­tic affairs.

Last, a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor will like­ly be named to inves­ti­gate the mas­sive elec­toral fraud that occurred up to, dur­ing, and after Nov 3rd in the Amer­i­can gen­er­al elec­tion, deliv­er the results to the Amer­i­can peo­ple, and hold those involved account­able. Attor­ney Rudy Giu­liani has been report­ing this pos­si­bil­i­ty as well.


Big Tech is at war with you! They don't want you to see the truth.



Send this to a friend